Diplomacy after Rupture: Interests Sections and Protecting Powers

Maintaining Contact after a Rupture

After diplomatic relations were broken, Cuba, Egypt, and Iraq maintained interests sections in Washington under the protection of third governments. These arrangements allowed officials to exchange messages, assist citizens, and protect diplomatic property. [1] [2] [3]

After the United States and Cuba broke relations in 1961, Switzerland represented American interests in Cuba and Czechoslovakia represented Cuban interests in the United States. In 1977, the two countries agreed to reciprocal interests sections staffed by their own diplomats. The Cuban section returned to the former embassy in Washington under Czechoslovak protection. [5] [1] [6]

Protecting Powers and the Terms of Access

Article 45 of the 1961 Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations required protection of mission premises, property, and archives after a rupture or recall. It also permitted a sending government to entrust its interests to a third state acceptable to the receiving government. [4]

After Iraq’s 1967 rupture, Iraqi officials worked under India’s embassy in Washington, while Belgium and local employees initially looked after American interests in Baghdad. In 1972, Joseph Sisco argued for sending American officers back so Washington could obtain better political and economic information. Baghdad explained that matching the two Iraqi diplomats in Washington with two Americans in Baghdad would leave the rupture in force. [3] [8]

Messages, Consular Work, and Emergency Assistance

Egypt, then officially named the United Arab Republic, broke relations with Washington during the June 1967 war. Spain protected American interests in Cairo, and India provided the framework for the Egyptian section in Washington. On 2 May 1968, Ashraf Ghorbal delivered to Dean Rusk a letter written by President Gamal Abdel Nasser the previous day. Nasser thanked President Lyndon Johnson for supporting a Security Council resolution against an Israeli military parade in Jerusalem and urged further pressure for compliance. Rusk promised to transmit the letter, and Walt Rostow forwarded it to Johnson. [7] [2] [10]

During disturbances involving the American interests section in Havana in 1980, the Swiss ambassador asserted the section’s immunity and organized food and medicine for those sheltering there. [1]

Returning to Direct Relations

Egypt and the United States restored diplomatic relations in February 1974; Iraq and the United States did so in November 1984. The Cuban and American sections lasted until July 2015. Switzerland had taken over protection of Cuban interests in Washington from Czechoslovakia in 1991. [7] [9] [5]

Further Reading

  1. Cuban and American Interests Sections Reopen. Follow the agreement that returned Cuban and American officials under protection by a third country. [6] [1]
  2. Egypt and the United States. Place the 1967 rupture and 1974 restoration around the surviving Washington communication channel. [7] [2]
  3. Iraq and the United States. Compare the 1967 break, 1972 staffing decision, and 1984 restoration as separate episodes. [3] [8] [9]
  4. Embassy of the Republic of Cuba Chancery. Examine a building reused for an interests section before it again housed an embassy. [1]

Sources

  1. Swiss FDFA, Opening of interests sections

    January 26, 2022; Opening of interests sections and Disturbances in front of the US interests section in 1980

  2. Gamal Abdel Nasser to President Lyndon Johnson, May 1, 1968

    FRUS 1964-1968, Volume XX, document 161, pp. 317-318; Johnson Library, National Security File, Special Head of State Correspondence File, United Arab Republic-Presidential Correspondence

  3. Joseph Sisco to William Macomber, Establishment of an Interests Section in Baghdad, May 25, 1972

    FRUS 1969-1976, Volume E-4, document 309; National Archives, RG 59, Central Files 1970-73, POL 17 US-IRAQ

  4. Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, Article 45

    Article 45, printed page 14, PDF page index 13; UN Treaty Series, volume 500, p. 95

  5. Swiss FDFA, Swiss protecting power mandates for the United States and Cuba

    Mandate history and end on July 20, 2015

  6. Terence Todman to Secretary of State Vance, The Havana Negotiations, May 2, 1977

    FRUS 1977-1980, Volume XXIII, document 15, pp. 34-39, especially footnote 6; Carter Library, National Security Affairs, Brzezinski Material, Brzezinski Office File, Country Chron File, Box 11, Cuba, 5/77

  7. Office of the Historian, Guide to Recognition and Diplomatic Relations: Egypt

    Severance, 1967; Interests Section, 1967; Re-establishment, 1974

  8. US Embassy Brussels telegram transmitting Iraqi Foreign Ministry statement, August 3, 1972

    FRUS 1969-1976, Volume E-4, document 323; Iraqi News Agency release dated July 29; National Archives, RG 59, Central Files 1970-73, POL 17 US-IRAQ

  9. Office of the Historian, Guide to Recognition and Diplomatic Relations: Iraq

    Diplomatic Relations Severed, 1967; Interests Section, 1972; Resumption, 1984

  10. Ghorbal delivers Nasser letter to Secretary Rusk, 2 May 1968

    FRUS 1964-1968, XX, document 162, pp.318-319, participants, opening and final paragraphs, source note

Notes

  • The three cases document particular arrangements after severance. They do not cover every protecting power mandate or show that an interests section necessarily led toward reconciliation.

Cite This Article

Diplomacy after Rupture: Interests Sections and Protecting Powers. Chanceries Diplopedia. Record version 0eba8b3e28358bd1e775.