Returning Cultural Property through Washington
An object returned at an embassy may have passed through a criminal investigation, customs enforcement, or a negotiated settlement with a museum. These routes impose different tasks on a mission: identifying an owner, securing cooperation between investigators, negotiating access to a collection, or arranging its transfer. The returns to Peru, Italy, and India show how public ceremonies conclude work carried out by police, prosecutors, curators, and diplomats, sometimes over many years. [6] [2] [8]
Tracing Stolen Objects
A dealer who noticed that two Peruvian colonial paintings had been cut from their frames contacted the FBI when the seller could not provide the necessary documentation. The paintings were returned to Ambassador Luis Miguel Valdivieso in 2010. In the Indian case, a tip about a falsely declared shipment in 2007 helped launch Operation Hidden Idol, the investigation associated with many of the objects presented for return in 2016. [6] [8]
Import Restrictions and Law Enforcement
Under the U.S. implementation of the 1970 UNESCO convention, agreements and emergency measures can restrict imports of designated categories of threatened archaeological or ethnological material. Peru concluded an agreement in 1997, and Italy followed in 2001. [4] [1]
At Peru’s embassy in July 2012, Ambassador Harold Forsyth received fourteen paintings and artifacts recovered through five investigations, alongside immigration enforcement director John Morton and Deputy Attorney General James Cole. At Italy’s embassy in October 2023, Ambassador Mariangela Zappia appeared with a Carabinieri cultural heritage commander, State Department officials, and Homeland Security Investigations representatives. [1] [3]
Negotiating a Museum Settlement
Peru’s November 2010 agreement with Yale concerned material excavated at Machu Picchu by Hiram Bingham. The university agreed to return it, and Yale and the Universidad Nacional de San Antonio Abad del Cusco subsequently planned a center in Cusco for display, conservation, and study. Shipments began in March 2011. [2]
At the Peruvian ambassador’s residence, Harold Forsyth later paid tribute to Yale president Richard Levin for the collection’s preservation and the plans for joint scholarship. [7] [2]
Announcing and Completing Repatriation
When Prime Minister Narendra Modi visited Washington in June 2016, Attorney General Loretta Lynch joined him to announce the return of more than 200 artifacts. India’s prime minister’s office distinguished twelve objects already returned from the larger group still moving through the process. [8] [9]
Modi and President Barack Obama included the repatriation in their joint statement and committed to further action against theft and trafficking. [5]
Further Reading
- Yale Begins Returning the Machu Picchu Materials. Begin with the negotiated return that also established a continuing academic partnership. [2]
- Harold Forsyth. Read the ambassador’s career alongside his role receiving recovered objects and recognizing the Yale settlement. [1] [7]
- Mariangela Zappia. Compare another ambassador’s public role in acknowledging the work of cultural protection agencies. [3]
- India and the United States. Place the 2016 cultural property commitment within the wider Indian and American relationship. [5]
Sources
- ICE returns stolen and looted art and antiquities to Peru
Opening, item list, investigation paragraphs, and bilateral agreement paragraph
- Peru-Yale Partnership for the Future of Machu Picchu Artifacts
Paragraphs beginning Yale University and the Government of Peru; In February 2011; Yale began in March 2011; The following September
- Restitution ceremony for artworks and archaeological finds at the Italian Embassy in Washington
Opening two paragraphs
- Current Agreements and Import Restrictions
Introduction; Italy; Peru
- India-US Joint Statement during PM's visit to USA
Building People-to-People Ties, paragraph on repatriation
- FBI Returns Paintings to Peru
Opening and paragraphs concerning gallery and provenance
- Remarks by Ambassador Forsyth at Presentation to President Levin
Paragraphs on 2010 Memorandum of Understanding, heritage, and UNSAAC partnership
- Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch Returns Ancient Artifacts to India
Opening; objects; Operation Hidden Idol paragraphs
- PM's engagements in Washington DC, USA
Paragraph beginning The Prime Minister attended a ceremony
Notes
- These cases concern selected returns involving Peru, Italy, and India. They do not represent the full range of cultural diplomacy or establish how often embassy intervention determines an outcome.
- The U.S. announcement in June 2016 described more than 200 Indian artifacts as returned; the Indian prime minister's office described twelve already returned and a process under way for the wider group. The text distinguishes the ceremony from completion of every shipment. [8] [9]
Cite This Article
Returning Cultural Property through Washington. Chanceries Diplopedia. Record version 723413f877d9dcd448d7.